An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or ethical principle might be applied to address the chosen topic.(The Topic :Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia) Topic: 3. An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or ethical principle might be applied to address the chosen topic.(The Topic :Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia)
This is a CLC assignment.
The CLC group selection process will be outlined by the instructor.
Refer to the Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment. In your CLC group, select a scenario from those listed in the assignment resource.
As a group, write a formal paper of 750-1,000 words identifying important components of the topic. Include the following:
1. A description of the topic and related ethical implications: (a) obligations to your profession and work as a nurse, (b) laws regarding this topic, and (c) stakeholders in this scenario.
2. A summary of the impact on social values, morals, norms, and nursing practice.
3. An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or ethical principle might be applied to address the chosen topic.(The Topic :Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia)Just write the #3. That is what I need.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the Submit” button under Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt My Attempts
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click New Attempt to start assignment or attach documents
Title Author Attached Documents Final Submission
No attempts made
: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One)
Less Than Satisfactory
20.0 % A Description of the Topic and Related Ethical Implications of Chosen Topic Does not identify contextual features related to topic. Does not distinguish among fact, opinion, and value judgments. Fails to identify implications and consequences of topic Incomplete discussion of issue. Superficial analysis of ethical implications. Limited consideration of preexisting assumptions. Limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies influence of assumptions, addressing ethical dimensions that underlie the issue. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue. Analysis includes consideration of preexisting socially constructed assumptions. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores confidentiality with global perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems.
20.0 % Provide Ethical Theories and/or Ethical Principles to Substantiate Your Position Does not identify ethical theory and/or principle from readings. Does not present own perspective. Discussion is grounded in absolutes, with little or no acknowledgement of own bias. Applies ethical theory and/or principle to issue, though some aspects are incorrect or confusing. Key details and connections between theory and application are missing. Presents own perspective without justification, does not address other views. Applies ethical theory and/or principle with limited integration. Analysis is incomplete. Presents own perspective without justification. Integrates multiple viewpoints and comparisons of ideas or perspectives using ethical theory and/or principles as a framework. Identifies own position on issue, but justification and connection to theory are incomplete. Appropriately identifies own position on issue, drawing support from lecture content, experience, and information beyond assigned sources. Integrates ethical theory and/or principle to substantiate position.
20.0 % A Summary of the Impact on Social Values, Morals, Norms and Nursing Practice Inadequate summary of one or both of the impacts is present. Evidence is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. A basic summary of the impacts is presented without specific details direction or emphasis. Project presents weak, marginal evidence and/or exhibit large gaps in the presentation of evidence, resulting from inconsistent connections with the argument. The contributions the resources made to the project are broadly listed, but not specifically or in detail. Evidence, such as textual sources, personal experience, and observation is appropriate to the audience and rhetorical situation. The evidence fulfills the minimum in terms of quantity and quality that is acceptable to support the argument. The contributions the resources made to the project are outlined. A diversity of types of evidence is present. The evidence extends beyond what is needed to support the argument effectively. The contribution each resource made to the project is described in detail and depth. Presents a compelling argument for inclusion of the resource in the project. The type, quantity, and/or quality of evidence resonate with the claims, argument, and structure of the paper. Irrefutable evidence from theoretical, academic, and practical sources is convincingly presented.
15.0 % An Explanation of How an Ethical Theory and/or Ethical Principle Might Be Applied to Address the Chosen Topic An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or principle might be applied to address the chosen topic is not offered. An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or principle might be applied to address the chosen topic is incorrect. Key details and connections between theory and application are missing. An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or principle might be applied to address the chosen topic meets the basic requirements for the assignment. An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or principle might be applied to address the chosen topic is provided in a detailed manner, while supported by rationale. An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or principle might be applied to address the chosen topic is provided in a detailed manner, supported by rationale, while predicting the future impact on the topic as a result of application of the ethical theory and / or principle.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 % Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage
Dilemma 3: Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia
Confronting Death: Who Chooses? Who Controls? A Dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/706/
The Terry Schiavo Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cki55BM42kw